EDMONTON — Internal budget documents released this week confirm that Alberta's healthcare administrative spending is on track to climb from $544 million in 2025 to approximately $604 million by 2028 — an increase the government attributes to "transition costs," and which independent observers attribute to the cost of running four health agencies in place of one.

Premier Danielle Smith, addressing the figures in a Wednesday scrum, described the rising administrative spend as "the restructuring working," and noted that the alternative — fewer administrators — would mean less administration, which she said would be "untenable for a system of this scale."

The figures arrive in the same week that Alberta Health Services confirmed surgical wait-time compliance has fallen to 58.2 percent, a development the Premier described as "expected" and "transitional." She did not clarify when the transition would conclude or what would replace it.

A senior bureaucrat within Primary Care Alberta, speaking on background, said the four-agency model had produced "a remarkable density of administrators per cubic metre of office space" and that internal coordination meetings now required up to three of the four agencies to attend in order to make a binding decision. The fourth, the bureaucrat said, was usually the one the decision was about.

Health policy analysts have begun comparing the new structure to the system it replaced and concluding, on every measurable axis, that the previous arrangement performed better. The Premier's office has not engaged with these analyses directly, instead noting that the analysts in question were "not part of the restructuring" and therefore "would not understand it from the inside."

When pressed on whether $604 million in administration represented value for money, the Premier said the question was unfair, because the value would only become visible "over the long term," a period of time she defined, for the purposes of the answer, as "after my time in office."

If we can administer the system more, perhaps we can administer our way out of needing to deliver the care, which would be true reform.